by Ross Saunders,
Acorn Press, 2014
This is an
interesting book: its twin, published earlier, is Outrageous Women, Outrageous God: Women in the First Two Generations of
Christianity. In both books Ross Saunders unpacks the idea that Jesus
upended ancient Mediterranean notions of honour, authority, leadership, and
servanthood. He offers readable, well-researched word-pictures of Jesus'
first-century disciples as they work out in their personal and
communal/ecclesial lives what it means to be truly radical, eschewing privilege
and power. The struggles they faced in the first two generations of Christianity
are also still ours.
Ross Saunders
(1926-2005) was a Sydney Anglican clergyman best known as a religious
broadcaster. But he was also an 'auto-didact' - a scholar in the fields of
Theology, Ancient History and Communications.
Anthropologists tell
us that Mediterranean cultures were built around honour maintenance; women were
recognized only in relationship to some man: a father, an uncle, a grandfather,
a brother, a husband, a son. It was almost impossible to better the social
position into which you were born. And it’s important to note that only
men experienced dishonour, not women. Women without
the benefit of male sponsorship found it almost impossible to survive.
Social security as we know it did not exist. The 'poor' helped by temple-funds
were usually asset-rich males who'd fallen on hard times. The beggars in the
streets were poor or disabled males. Women couldn't easily survive by begging,
because passers-by would favour males. Younger women often had no option but to
go into prostitution.
Eldest sons invariably followed their father's craft (so Jesus was a plough-maker, as Joseph was). Peter came from the household of an entrepreneur: he had no status until his father died. Until then he was known as Simon-son-of-Jonas. Jesus had brought shame upon his father's reputation by leaving the household after his father’s death. (Note that at the cross Jesus hands over his mother to the care of the disciple John. Note also that with Jesus' death, his brother James became next in line in the household. 'But Jesus had changed that by entrusting his mother to John, not to James').
Eldest sons invariably followed their father's craft (so Jesus was a plough-maker, as Joseph was). Peter came from the household of an entrepreneur: he had no status until his father died. Until then he was known as Simon-son-of-Jonas. Jesus had brought shame upon his father's reputation by leaving the household after his father’s death. (Note that at the cross Jesus hands over his mother to the care of the disciple John. Note also that with Jesus' death, his brother James became next in line in the household. 'But Jesus had changed that by entrusting his mother to John, not to James').
And
following Jesus came at a cost. If a junior member of a household became a
disciple there would be division in the household, often resulting in that
member being disowned. Should Jesus prove to be a fraud, they could not return
to their families as though nothing had happened. It was an irrevocable
decision.
Socio-cultural
result? In contrast to a situation where everybody has a place virtually fixed
at birth, in today's world we regard ourselves primarily as individuals.
Christianity changed the way its members found their identity and, in the
process, helped to break down the Mediterranean household as the basic unit of
society. 'When households are mentioned [in
the NT] in connection with conversions to Christianity, this was the exception
and not the norm. This was one of the things that set Christianity off from all
other religions at the time.’
Ross Saunders’ main emphasis
is on the theme of leadership: Jesus in his life and teachings changed the model
of leader-as-director to leader-as-servant. 'Ultimately, this is
what Christian leadership is about: eliminating the chasm between the leader
and the led'. Jesus called upon his
followers 'to relinquish their status... [so] women went up a step or two on
the social scale, [while] men went down a step or two'. Adult males were to divest 'themselves of all their pretensions to
status, and became like a child - in that society completely without status
–[otherwise] they had no hope of membership [in the kingdom]'. When he sent out his
disciples [in Mark 6:7-13] they were to wear sandals, the footwear of the
peasant. But 'the concept that honour must be attached to leadership... was [still] strong,
and it was something that was to dog missionaries like Paul...'
Saunders’ book does
not go beyond the end of the first century: then 'male bishops took over
Christianity, [reverting] to the normal household model for centralising church
structures, and lay ministry, both male and female, disappeared almost
totally.'
This book is as
interesting in terms of scholarly style as it is thematically. I don't think he
cites one scholar, and there are no footnotes. However an excellent Select
Bibliography gives us a clue about his wider reading: here there are listed
authors like the Evangelicals F. F. Bruce, I. H. Marshall and E.A.Judge, to
scholars with a wider theological stance, like J. Jeremias and G. Theissen. He
has, for example, a fairly conservative view of who-wrote-what in the NT, but
he is not afraid to cite differences in the four Gospels' narrative-details -
without doing too much explaining about how they can be reconciled. They are
simply left, side-by-side, expressing differences in perspective between
Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
Australian
colloquialisms are sprinkled throughout:
'a dandy dressed up to the nines'; 'cop all the shame'; 'they tear
out in great consternation to find their leader'; 'whatever I have in mind for
John, even if it is to hang around until I return to earth’; Peter was ‘clapped
in irons in prison’…
And twenty-to-thirty more…
I marked the
following, to ponder:
- For
Israelites, prayer was always audible, never silent in the mind the way we
today tend to pray. The Ethiopian eunuch was reading his
scroll aloud: 'Silent reading was certainly not the process of reading in
those days'.
- The
‘laying on of hands’ was never on heads. Human hair was not to be touched
by other people for fear of touching dust or sweat. The main greeting method:
'the two shoulders grasp'.
- 'Giving to the
poor was not counted as maintaining one's honour in the community. The
poor could not repay by having a benefactor's name written up in the
synagogue or temple.'
- Paul was 'not a
consultative or democratic kind of team leader... We must be careful...
not to romanticise Paul and smooth over the sharp edges and directive
attitudes'.
- 'Whenever Paul
uses "head" with respect to Christ it is always associated with
his self-sacrificial love for the church. In other words
"headship" here derives from commitment and self-sacrifice and
does not entail privilege and the right to be obeyed.'
- 'I believe it
is abundantly clear that there were no orders, of deacons, priests or
bishops, during the first two generations of Christianity. In fact, there
were no clergy, in our sense, until the turn of the century.'
If there had been a
list of discussion starters, this would have been a good one:
'Prayer and the
drawing of straws' (Acts1:15-26). Does your church elect leaders this way?
Conclusion: 'For men, neither ascribed nor acquired honour had any place in the congregations. The usual games of challenge and response that occurred when men greeted each other on the street had to stop'. 'We must have a great deal of sympathy for those first two generations of men in the churches. They had to lose just about everything they had been born with: honour, prestige, position, authority and entitlement to dominion over women and children.'
Conclusion: 'For men, neither ascribed nor acquired honour had any place in the congregations. The usual games of challenge and response that occurred when men greeted each other on the street had to stop'. 'We must have a great deal of sympathy for those first two generations of men in the churches. They had to lose just about everything they had been born with: honour, prestige, position, authority and entitlement to dominion over women and children.'
Rowland Croucher
jmm.org.au
May 6, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment