Wednesday, August 13, 2014

MY ALL-TIME FAVOURITE PREACHER: JOHN CLAYPOOL



Once a month, while pastoring a busy church in the 1970s/1980s, I’d receive John Claypool’s printed sermons in the mail. Invariably the rest of the morning was spent devouring them. He was – still is - the best ‘writing preacher’ I’ve ever read. If there is one spot on this planet where I’d choose to spend a six-month study-sabbatical, it would be in a quiet room at the Southern Baptist Historical Library and Archives, reading their collection of his sermons.

John Claypool didn’t fit easily into the conservative milieu of the Southern Baptist Convention. He was regarded with some suspicion as one of those ‘Moderates’ or ‘Cooperatives’ who inhabited the cutting edge of theological enquiry and socio-political issues – especially racism.

John Claypool was ordained to the Baptist ministry in 1953 and pastored five Southern Baptist churches - in Kentucky, Tennessee, Texas, and Mississippi. Ordained an Episcopal priest in 1986, he served as Rector of St. Luke's Episcopal Church in Birmingham, Alabama, for nearly fourteen years. He retired from full-time parish ministry in 2000 and then served as Professor of Preaching at McAfee School of Theology, Mercer University in Atlanta, Georgia…

Why ‘writing preacher’? I’ve met John Claypool, and heard him preach. His preaching-style was thoughtful, and his vocal presentation a bit ‘dreamy’. But his words and ideas-about-ideas, if you ‘hung in there,’ were often mind-blowing.

But John Claypool was not simply an intellectual. His brilliant book The Preaching Event (the 1979 Lyman Beecher Lectures at Yale Divinity School) discusses the what, why, how and when of preaching. The preacher, he says, is a reconciler, who seeks to re-establish trust at the deepest level. We are ‘gift-givers’: too often preaching can fulfil our own needs for love and status. We are witnesses: making available our own grapplings with woundedness to help others in their pain and grief.

In a memorable interview with Claypool conducted by The Wittenburg Door magazine (April/May 1978) he revealed the core issues which made him the person he turned out to be. His spiritual awakening happened in College when he read C S Lewis, and with a ‘real flash of insight saw that Jesus was the clue to ultimate reality’.

Why did he enter pastoral ministry? Among other reasons, to ‘earn the blessing of his mother’. When this realization hit him later, he developed a ‘confessional’ preaching style – which, he would tell students in his seminary classes, can be a subtle form of exhibitionism if you’re not careful.

He had a close friendship with Martin Luther King Jr. (a ‘first-rate thinker’) and was active in the civil rights movement. Once he was in a coffee shop with Dr. King, and a journalist took a picture of the two of them. When that photo appeared in the Louisville Courier, he and his family received hate calls and mail, crosses were burned in their front yard, and his children were threatened. When he championed the idea that a Nigerian seminary student (‘that our missionaries had converted’) should be permitted to attend their church ‘a lot of people left and the money dropped off’.

Another significant event was his surprising resignation – after only 5 ½ years - from a church of 5,000 and 11 staff, to go to a much smaller pastorate. Why would a gifted preacher step down the rungs of the ‘success ladder’ and do such a thing? Simple: he was tired, and for him ‘fatigue became a moral category’. He was challenged by Gayle Sheehey’s book ‘Passages’ about the dangers in mid-life of over-investment in work and under-investment in relationships. Conducting hundreds of funerals of people he didn’t know (and hoping he pronounced the names right) became wearing. ‘A major mistake,’ he confessed later, was that I didn’t call in the community. I acted in isolation: there were surely many options in any situation that address the panicky fear of a tired person’. So he negotiated a paid month off before starting in his new role to study at Yale Divinity School. Slowly he was re-invigorated, and learned that ‘God is the God of fertilizer: God can take dung and bring things of beauty out of it’.

But his most ‘wounding’ event was the death of their little eight-year-old girl, Laura Lue, diagnosed with acute leukemia. She lived only eighteen months and ten days after that first shocking news was given to her parents. Tracks of a Fellow Struggler, his first and probably his best-known book, comprises sermons he preached during that time, together with a final chapter ‘Learning to Handle Grief’, preached three and a half years later. It’s the book I’ve shared with many parishioners who’ve had to journey ‘into the valley of the shadow of death’ with a loved one.

He often told this story about his way of handling grief: 

“We did not have a washing machine during World War II and gas was rationed. It was going to be a real challenge. At about that time one of my father’s younger business associates was suddenly drafted into the service. My father offered to let them store their furniture in our basement while he had to be away. Well it so happened that they had an old grey Bendix washing machine. And as they were moving in, my father suggested that maybe they would let us use their machine in lieu of our giving them some storage space.

“The next question became, who is going to become the wash person in the family?

“In that mysterious way that families assign roles, I became the wash person at the grand old age of eleven! For the next four years, I had a ritual every Tuesday and every Friday. I would come home from school, gather up the wash, take it down into the basement, fill the old Bendix with water, put in the clothes, add some soap, and then watch as the plunger would make all kinds of configurations of suds. It had a hand roller to wring the washed clothes out and I can remember as a child trying to stick my finger between those rollers to see how far I could go without it cutting off circulation. In other words, I became affectionately bonded to that old mechanism in those four years.

“When the war was over my father’s friend came back. One day when I was at school, a truck came to our basement, took out all of their things, including the washing machine, and nobody had told me. It was a Tuesday. I came home and gathered up the clothes, went down in the basement, and to this day I can remember my sense of horror as I saw that empty space where the old Bendix had been. I put down the clothes and rushed back upstairs and announced loudly, ‘We have been robbed! Somebody stole our washing machine!’

“My mother, who was not only a musician but also a wise human being, sat me down and said, ‘John, you’ve obviously forgotten how that machine got to be in our basement. It never did belong to us. That we ever got to use it was incredibly good fortune.’ And then she said, ‘If something is a possession and it’s taken away, you have a right to be angry. But if something is a gift and it’s taken, you use that moment to give thanks that it was ever given at all.’

“That was the memory that resurfaced for me the night Laura Lou died. [That little girl] was in my life the way the old Bendix washing machine was in our basement and I heard the voice of my mother say, ‘If it is a gift and it’s taken, you use that occasion to give thanks that it was ever given at all.’ And that memory helped me to decide that night to take the road of gratitude out of the valley of sorrow. The Twenty-third Psalm speaks of walking through the valley of the shadow of grief. I would suggest to you that the road of gratitude is the best way I know not to get bogged down in our grief but to make our way through it.

“Life is gift, birth is windfall, and all, all is grace. And I give you the gift that was given to me and I pray that somehow the sense of life as gift will enable you to make a brave and hopeful journey, not just into the valley of the shadow of bereavement, but through that valley to the light on the other side. May your journey be a brave one. Amen."


~~

John Claypool wrote eleven books, and in 2008 a new collection of his sermons on the twelve disciples, entitled The First to Follow, edited by his widow Ann Wilkinson Claypool, was published.

He died on September 3, 2005 aged 74. In a eulogy Kirby Godsey, President of Mercer University, said, “John Claypool touched our souls. Amidst our wounds and our triumphs, his voice became for us the voice of God - a special measure of grace and with unfettered gentleness. John's presence in our lives and our histories is more than mere death can ever take away. He will continue to walk among us, giving light to our steps, wisdom for our hearts, and hope to our souls. John Claypool's life and presence and teaching were profound and enduring gifts to the entire Mercer University community."

Rowland Croucher

Many of John Claypool’s sermons are available online: including a few on our John Mark Ministries website (jmm.org.au). I have borrowed some ideas from his notable homily on Ananias and Sapphira and adapted them here: http://www.jmm.org.au/articles/2400.htm .

Rowland Croucher




WHAT WOULD JESUS DO?



Book Review: The Songs of Jesse Adams, Peter McKinnon, Acorn 2014.

‘WWJD?’ has been a very popular slogan in Evangelical Christianity since the days of the Jesus People in the 60s/70s. Every Christian pastor has preached or counseled asking “If Jesus came to [our town] what would he be doing? Who would he be with (would he hang out with society’s riff-raff again?). What would he say about the evils and self-interest embedded at all levels in our country?”

Whilst we preachers mightn’t be too specific about some things (unless we’re ready for another Golgotha: still happens), here’s a novel - Peter’s first - which in 346 very readable pages tries to imagine Jesus and his followers in the 1960s/early 70s Melbourne and its environs.

Peter McKinnon is an interesting man. He’s produced two musicals; is au fait with the business-world; and he remembers ‘those days’ very well. (I knew him in the 1970s/early 80s: a multi-talented parishioner, working – if I recall - as a psychologist with Trans Australian Airways screening wannabe hostesses (‘they mustn’t be too pretty or too plain’).

We who have ‘remember when’ conversations about Australian life and culture ‘back then’ will resonate with authentic descriptions on every page: three or four different brands of cigarettes (who recalls the Peter Stuyvesants?), Kingswoods, the paper-boy on his Malvern Star, trams (their ‘ding ding ding’ provides the music for a disciple’s betrayal), Flinders’ Street, Fitzroy, Carlton playing the Demons, a country town’s chook races, bodgies and bolshies, Albert Langer, Monash Maoists, Vietnam War protests, Kentucky Fried Chicken (the newest food sensation)… There are words/phrases/clichés I’ve not heard for decades: ‘You’ve been had’, galoots (remember that word?) and many more…    

And if you went to Sunday School ‘back then’ (more of us did) you’ll enjoy spotting the Gospels’ equivalents of about 30 or 40 characters and events: Mary Magdalene, Jesus’ mother Mary, Peter, the rich young ruler (“it’s all or nothing Jarret”), the cleansing of the temple (done by Jesse in a Melbourne city church!), ‘lost and found’ stories, the ‘woman with five de factos, six including the last dropkick’, the Good Samaritan, one of the lyrics an interesting ‘take’ on the Lord’s Prayer, Judas, the Sadducees/politicians, the Last Supper (in a pub, the ‘Doubtful’!), the mockery of a trial, the Emmaus-event, and many more…

But above all there are the constants in terms of human sinning (‘like a terminal cancer’): an inordinate preoccupation with earning, amassing and stealing money, institutional evil (police, government, church, media et al), widespread antipathy towards society’s scapegoats – homosexuals, ‘communists’, criminal gangs (they’re at the bottom and the top of our culture).   

Peter’s writing-style is quite brilliant. How about this: ‘wearing a grin that would charm the stripes off a tiger’? He’s mostly restrained, sometimes oblique, until you get to the gripping page-turning denouement events towards the end. The build-up includes some dramatic events – as when Jesse hijacks a mayoral men-only function and invites the women to join them; or interrupts a State parliamentary sitting! Many of these scenarios are somewhat improbable. Exactly!

So here we have a bush-boy who becomes God-man, and whose message is clear: Love is all you need. Love wins no matter what life throws up. Happy is good; free is better. ‘I don’t want to own anything.’ And even ‘Peace for poofters’ (p. 238).

People from everywhere came just to hear this ‘stirrer from nowhere’ talk (as well as sing). ‘He was The Man’ (p.86), his era’s most charismatic pop-star, its greatest celebrity - a sort-of cross between the Beatles and Jesus. (I know someone born back then who says “If church can be as good as a U2 concert I’d be there every week!”). But Jesse is humble: “As for who’s the best – it’s the kid here. Big shots come last in my book” (p. 248). And like Jesus he needed to slip away occasionally to enjoy some solitude (he liked hotel roof-tops and similar places).

Ever thought about this: ‘How can a body go missing from a modern city’s morgue?’ Good question.

I can imagine church youth groups and reading clubs having a wonderful time with this book.

Rowland Croucher
jmm.org.au

July 2014

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE



Some notes from a Progressive (Evangelical) Christian Viewpoint.

by Rowland Croucher

As I write, today (14/7/2014) the story of a gay man who’s just come out of his painful closet – Australia’s most successful Olympian Ian Thorpe – is everywhere in the public media. (ABC NewsMail’s headline: “Ian Thorpe says he concealed sexuality out of fear”. The Melbourne Age’s editorial: “The rate of self-harm and suicide for homosexual youth ranks well above their peers and is a telling sign of an urgent problem that must be confronted”). [1]  Ian is now one of the three highest-profile gay men in Australia – with Federal Greens politician Dr Bob Brown and the Honourable Michael Kirby (former Justice of the High Court). [2] 

And in the media, just this month, are many stories of married lesbian and gay couples who have returned from celebrating their nuptials in New Zealand or in a British consulate, or elsewhere, who now face (temporarily, we hope) a complicated legal status in a country which hasn’t yet caught up with the the UK, NZ, Canada and other similar Western progressive nations on this issue… 


Same-sex marriage (SSM) or ‘gay marriage’ is the legally recognized union of  two people with the same biological sex and/or gender/identity. Advocates of SSM often prefer the term ‘Marriage Equality’.

As of 28 June 2014, 16 countries (Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Spain, South Africa, Sweden, the UK, Uruguay), and several states/sub-national jurisdictions in the US and in Mexico allow same-sex couples to marry. Coming up: Scotland (late 2014?), and the European Court of Human Rights (as soon as enough countries fall into line). [3] Australia? The process will almost certainly get under way when the conservative Coalition parties allow a conscience vote.

Around the world there is rising support - a clear majority now in all Western nations, across every age group, political ideology, gender, race and many religious denominations -  for legally recognizing same-sex marriage. Support for SSM is now (15/7/2014) higher in Australia than in any other country, including NZ and the UK, when they passed marriage equality laws.
[4]

The recognition of SSM is a political, social, human rights, religious and civil rights issue: as were the paradigm shifts associated with the slavery, race,  [5], divorce, and gender equality. Gays and lesbians are not going away: they pay taxes too, so they ask “Why should we settle for a lesser status (eg. equivalence to ‘de facto’ or civil unions) rather than be allowed full marriage, with all the relevant social and legal protections?”

The doyen of English-speaking public theologians, Martin Marty, endorses these judgments: “The gay rights movement has achieved more swiftly than any other individual rights movement in history, not merely the impossible but the unthinkable.”[6]  And: “In the glacial scheme of social change, attitudes about gay marriage are evolving at whitewater speed.” [7].  US Supreme Court decisions may slow that speed, but “it seems certain that in the not too distant future, we will look back on today’s opposition [on this subject] the way we now view opposition to interracial marriage - as a blatant violation of basic constitutional commitments to equality and human dignity.” [8]  Indeed, “Issues connected with [SSM are] the most church-dividing since the Council of Nicea or the Protestant Reformation.” [9]   

Conservative politicians tend to argue that SSM is antithetical to civilization as we have understood it: marriage is between a man and a woman. Christian and Jewish conservatives include an appeal to tradition and/or biblical authority. The fall-back position for many Catholics and some Protestants: “Gay marriage is against Natural Law, so it’s simply wrong.” But Marty opines: “[Natural law] teachings, when invoked, tend to match what people have already decided, on other grounds, is right or wrong.” [10]

Here are three important professional bodies’ contributions to the discussion:

The UK Royal College of Psychiatrists (April 2014): “Homosexuality is not a psychiatric disorder… The College holds the view that lesbian, gay and bisexual people are and should be regarded as valued members of society, who have exactly similar rights and responsibilities as all other citizens. This includes equal access to healthcare, the rights and responsibilities involved in a civil partnership/marriage, the rights and responsibilities involved in procreating and bringing up children, freedom to practise a religion as a lay person or religious leader, freedom from harassment or discrimination in any sphere and a right to protection from therapies that are potentially damaging, particularly those that purport to change sexual orientation.” [11]            

The American Anthropological Association (2005) has stated that the results of more than a century of research on households, kinship relationships, and families, across cultures and through time, “provide no support whatsoever for the view that either civilization or viable social orders depend upon marriage as an exclusively heterosexual institution.” [12]  

And from the American Academy of Pediatrics (2006): “There is ample evidence to show that children raised by same-gender parents fare as well as those raised by heterosexual parents. More than 25 years of research have documented that there is no relationship between parents' sexual orientation and any measure of a child's emotional, psychosocial, and behavioral adjustment. These data have demonstrated no risk to children as a result of growing up in a family with one or more gay parents. Conscientious and nurturing adults, whether they are men or women, heterosexual or homosexual, can be excellent parents. The rights, benefits, and protections of civil marriage can further strengthen these families.” [13]  

Pronouncements such as these have dramatically influenced the thinking of anti-SSM advocates. As the theologically liberal Christian Century editorialized (to coincide with the US Supreme Court’s initial consideration as to whether gays have a constitutional right to marry, March 2013):

“It’s remarkable not only how much public opinion has recently shifted toward endorsing gay marriage, but how thin are the legal arguments now arrayed against it. Neither the brief offered by ProtectMarriage on behalf of California’s Proposition 8 nor the one by House Republicans on behalf of the Defense of Marriage Act attempts to argue that same-sex couples are a threat to society or children. The House brief simply asserts that it is “rational” to believe that children fare better when raised by biological parents of both sexes — without marshaling much evidence for this view.

“Both briefs introduce as part of their case against same-sex marriage a curious new argument about the ‘social risks’ presented not by homosexual couples but by heterosexual couples. The point is that reckless sexual relations between unmarried heterosexuals can produce unintended offspring, which are a potential burden to society, whereas reckless sex between homosexual couples doesn’t pose this threat. Therefore, the briefs say, society has reason to offer heterosexual couples, not gay and lesbian couples, the distinct benefits of marriage.

“One immediate objection to this inverted argument is obvious: Why should gays and lesbians be denied the benefits of marriage because they don’t present the same social risks that heterosexuals do? In any case, denying gay couples the right to marry would not do anything to steer reckless sexually active heterosexuals toward the responsibilities of marriage.”

Is procreation a defining element in defining a legitimate marriage?

“Inside and outside the church, marriage has long been defined as the lifelong commitment of two people to sharing all things in life — children, property, money, joys, sorrows, poverty, prosperity. What Christians have added to this general understanding is not an insistence on procreation but rather an insistence that marriage mirrors in some way God’s fidelity to creation and to God’s people. Because marriage reflects God’s faithfulness, Christians believe that living out an unconditional lifelong commitment to another person offers a way of living more deeply into God’s purposes for one’s own life. Marriage offers a path leading one out of selfish desires into greater concern for the welfare of others. That distinctively Christian understanding of marriage would not be damaged by a legal endorsement of same-sex marriage. It could even be enhanced.” [14]

A couple of interesting published comments followed that statement: “Luther and Calvin both challenged the theological norm of their day that marriage was first, for the procreation of children.  Rather, they posited, God had provided a way out of human loneliness via the call to lifelong committed relationship.”

(Jesus’ and Paul’s recorded words never connected the institution of marriage with procreation).

[Re Church and State]: “In Europe, marriage is first a matter of state law. If a couple desires to have their marriage blessed by the religious body of their choice, they may do so. With the blurring of the separation of church and state comes the confusion between ‘rights’ and ‘rites.’ Let the state define people’s legal right to wed, but let religious bodies define and exercise the rite of marriage that reflects their faith, tradition and practice.”

Conservative vs Progressive Hermeneutics

Conservative ‘People of the Book’ (Jews, Christians, Muslims) tend to offer early in their rationale on this issue, quotes from their holy books, interpreted by authoritative teachers. For such traditionalists, male-female union is an icon of creation: the two genders are complementary. And same-sex liaisons get a mostly ‘negative press’ in all three religions’ traditions.

But what to do with a law like this one? ‘If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination.’ (Lev. 20:13).  Martin Marty again: “Most quoters stop there, but it goes on: ‘They shall be put to death’. Seriously, if the first half of that verse is divinely-inspired and authoritative, who are we moderns to decide that the second half is not, and that it can be shrugged off?  The same goes for other scriptural death penalty cases.  As every smart… New Atheist reminds us, Leviticus and Deuteronomy command capital punishment in numerous clear and specified instances:  when children curse their parents, when anyone blasphemes, and even when a son is persistently disobedient.  He should be put to death: that’s God’s law… No Jews are Jews because God told their ancestors to commit omnicide against the Amalekites.  No Christians, whose book also includes Leviticus and Deuteronomy, use it to punish men who have intercourse with a menstruating wife.  No Christians in our cultures use the Bible, which never de-legitimizes slavery, to legitimize slavery.” [15] 

And surely sins listed in Romans 1:26, 1 Corinthians 6:9 etc. do not refer to life-long loving unions between same sex couples.

Progressive Christians tend to reinforce their worldview with assertions like these:

1. It’s not smart to conceptualize too many realities as dualistic binary oppositions: we live in a world of ambiguity.

2. The Sodom and Gomorrah story might still be important for fundamentalists, but doesn’t feature so much these days in scholarly discussions. It was a story about gang rape, not loving unions.

3. Jesus (eg. Sabbath laws) and Paul have encouraged us to view a legalistic interpretation of the Mosaic law as antithetical to grace. Galatians states the underlying principle, and it's worth noticing Paul's conjunctions. "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no longer 'male and female': for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Gal. 3:28). [16]

Progressives tend to be guided by a higher commitment to ‘grace’ rather than law/dogma, as they believe Jesus was with his ethic of inclusion. Thus many erstwhile opponents of SSM have radically changed their mind when a loved-one ‘came out’ as gay. (What’s new, many progressive apologists ask: the same thing happened with the inter-racial and divorce paradigms).

So progressive Christian theology is more dynamic than static. ‘The Lord has yet more light and truth to break forth from his holy Word.’ The apostle Peter learned this the hard way and in the encounter with the gentile Cornelius changed his mind on who was/was not accepted by God.  The Adam and Eve story is especially relevant for singles: a man with a man is a lot closer to a man with a woman than a man who chooses no partner at all. Gays and lesbians surely don’t have to be sentenced to lives of terrible loneliness.

An important question: how did humans learn to discriminate against certain individuals/groups? Rene Girard has been most helpful here with his notion of mimetic rivalry: humans learn bigotry from parents/significant others. Society is believed to be at risk from ‘alien others’, so they must be opposed/ humiliated/punished/exiled… even killed. In other words, these alien individuals or outgroups become ‘scapegoats’ in a society’s quest for purity, salvation, orthodoxy, whatever.

But the supreme Judeo-Christian ethic is a commitment to Love for God and neighbor. And re our conjugal partner, the marriage vows affirm: "For better for worse, for richer for poorer, in sickness and in health, till death do us part."

John Maynard Keynes used this provocation to effect: “When the facts change, I change my mind. And you, sir?” History is littered with conservative ideas which collided with the findings of science and stoked the fear of cognitive dissonance. I for one would not like to be judged as being on the wrong side of history this time around…

Conclusion

So among Christians – at least in the West - there’s been a significant migration from conservative to progressive thinking on this broad issue [17] (I leave it to more-knowledgeable others to generalize about Jewish and Islamic trends). A significant factor: Conservative Evangelical Christians were the drivers of world-wide mission in the last few centuries, but were slow to engage with some serious human-rights issues, in deference to the host governments where they ministered. But the times are a’changing: now they are partnering with Ecumenical/Liberal Christians, Catholics, Jews, secularists, and feminists on many fronts, reminding us of Alfred North Whitehead's dictum: "Great ideas enter into reality with evil associates and with disgusting alliances. But the greatness remains, nerving the race in its slow ascent." [18]  

The Last Word: US Bishop Gene Robinson

Gene Robinson is the world’s first openly gay bishop elected to the historic episcopate (2003). He married Mark Andrew – his partner for a total of 25 years - in 2008. They ended their union on May, 2014, about which he writes: ‘My belief in marriage is undiminished by the reality of divorcing someone I have loved for a very long time, and will continue to love even as we separate. Love can endure, even if marriage cannot.’ [19]

The thesis in his book God Believes in Love: Straight Talk about Gay Marriage: ‘Marriage is a sacrament and nothing in Scripture or orthodox theology precludes our opening the institution to same-gender couples. The legal marriage of two same-gender people – like the rather recent opening of legal marriage to interracial couples – retains the traditional meaning of marriage while expanding the number of people whom it may benefit.’

Here’s a summary of Gene’s ten theses: (1) It’s time for gays to be treated with the same dignity as heterosexuals; (2) Jesus said ‘Do to others what you would have them do to you’; (3) ‘Civil Unions’ don’t affirm a partner’s full rights; (4)  Nowhere in Scripture is there a wholesale condemnation of the loving relationships of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people; (5) Jesus was champion of the poor, the oppressed, and the marginalized; (6) Marriage is a matter for the state, and historically is quite fluid: until relatively recently interracial marriage (miscegenation) was forbidden in America, Nazi Germany, South Africa and elsewhere; (7) There are plenty of reasons why marriages are stressful and end in divorce. None of them relate to the idea of gay marriage; (8) Religious opposition to same-gender marriage is an example of the violation of the separation of church and state: the Church is trying to meddle in the rightful business of the State;  (9) Parenting? No research supports the widely held conviction that the gender of parents matters for child well-being; (10) It’s not about homophobia (“a word I don’t use; it’s a conversation-stopper”) but justice.

“The opportunity to love one person and to have that love sanctioned and supported by the culture in which we live is a right denied gay and lesbian people for countless centuries. It’s time to open that opportunity to all of us. Because in the end, God believes in love.’  [20]



Footnotes.  

[1] The Age 15/7/2014 

[2] jmm.org.au/articles/29447.htm ; jmm.org.au/articles/30819.htm

[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage 

[4] Lisa Cox: ‘Support growing for same-sex marriage’, The Age, 15/7/2014,  p.8 

[5] But it’s interesting that black churches in the US are divided over SSM: see Maza, Carlos. “Three Things The Media Should Know About Rev. William Owens And His Coalition Of African-American Pastors.” Equality Matters (blog), August 8, 2012. Accessed July 13, 2013.  http://equalitymatters.org/blog/201208080002 ; “Black Pastors Condemn Supreme Court For Ruling on Gay Marriage.” Atlanta Daily World, June 26, 2013. Accessed July 13, 2013. http://www.atlantadailyworld.com/201306267036/Original/black-pastors-condemn-supreme-court-for-ruling-on-gay-marriage.
“The Black Church.” BlackDemographics.com. Accessed July 13, 2013. http://blackdemographics.com/culture/religion/

[6]  David Cole may have been the first to describe the legalizing of same-sex marriage with this observation, “Getting Nearer and Nearer’,  New York Review of Books, January 10, 2013, reviewing Michael J. Klarman’s From the Closet to the Altar: Courts, Backlash, and the Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage (OUP) 

[7]  Citing Ellen Goodman Sightings  1/14/2013, “Gay Marriage Tidewater”

[8]  Ibid.

[9]  *Sightings* 3/1/10, “Biblical Literalism”

[10]  Marty, Sightings,  1/14/2013

[11]  http://www.jmm.org.au/articles/33500.htm

[12]  American Anthropological Association (2005) "Statement on Marriage and the Family from the American Anthropological Association",  Retrieved 10 November 2010

[13]  Pawelski, J. G.; Perrin, E. C.; Foy, J. M.; Allen, C. E.; Crawford, J. E.; Del Monte, M.; Kaufman, M.; Klein, J. D.; Smith, K.; Springer, S.; Tanner, J. L.; Vickers, D. L. (2006). "The Effects of Marriage, Civil Union, and Domestic Partnership Laws on the Health and Well-being of  Children". Pediatrics 118 (1): 349–364. Cited here:

[14]  ‘FROM THE EDITORS’, Christian Century, ‘Blessing Gay Marriage’, March 04, 2013

[15]  Sightings 3/1/10, ‘Biblical Literalism’ by Martin E. Marty

[16]  More from a conservative Christian viewpoint: Michael Bird, Gordon Preece, et. al. Sexegesis: An Evangelical Response to Five Uneasy Pieces (Anglican Press, Australia, 2002). ‘Shows that the traditional reading of Scripture, as against homosexual practice but for homosexual people, still makes sense of the Bible text. This is contrary to the more liberal revisionist reading of Scripture in Five Uneasy Pieces’ [goodreads.com]. Robert Gagnon’s The Bible and Homosexual Practice: Texts and Hermeneutics (2002) is still one of the most thorough volumes – written by an outstanding scholar who is both theologically conservative on this broad issue, but is also a non-inerrantist: his work is commended by James Barr and many other highly acclaimed conservative Christian theologians many of whom are also polemicists in their opposition to Fundamentalism. [See Amazon’s impressive list of commendations].  See also Rev. Dr. Mark Durie’s views, here: http://stmarysvicar.blogspot.com.au/2013/06/four-research-issues-relating-to-same.html

[17]  My first book: Recent Trends Among Evangelicals, http://www.jmm.org.au/articles/12125.htm

[18]  Martin E. Marty: Human Rights Bedfellows, Sightings, October 4, 2004; Allen D. Hertzke. Rowman & Littlefield: Freeing God's Children: The Unlikely Alliance for Global Human Rights; Johan D. Van Der Vyver and John Witte, Jr. Martinus Nijhoff eds., Religious Human Rights in Global Perspectives: Legal Perspectives (Vol. I), Religious Perspectives (Vol. II)

[19]  thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/05/04
[20]  ]  Bishop Gene Robinson, God Believes in Love: Straight Talk about Gay Marriage, 2012. For a longer review/summary visit http://www.jmm.org.au/articles/31311.htm 
 







Tuesday, August 12, 2014

PREACHING

Preachers other preachers read (and preach!)

I talk to lots of clergy - in conferences and one to one – and have a pretty good idea about their preaching styles, and the other preachers they read for inspiration.

An interesting thing happened on the way to writing this chapter,  on Mothers’ Day 2014. My wife has produced one of the two or three most popular Mothers’ Day sermons online. (Google those words and you’ll find hers in the top four – out of one million). In the week before every (North American) Mothers’ Day up to 5,000 people daily read her sermon. And many preach it – some without acknowledgement. (Jan still smiles when she remembers the apologetic email she received from an American pastor who did just that – and was caught out!).

Some people – I’m one of them – actually enjoy reading others’ sermons. When John Claypool used to publish his each week, and sent them out once a month, I often found myself dropping everything to read them. I’ve done the same with other contemporary homiletical ‘greats’ like Richard Rohr, Brian McLaren, Barbara Brown Taylor, Frederick Buechner, Tom Long, Eugene Peterson, Fred Craddock and William Willimon. And, a generation ago, W.E. Sangster, James Stewart, and Helmut Thielicke. Before that, F.W. Boreham and at the turn of the 20th Century the often-circumloquacious but erudite and orthodox Peter Taylor Forsyth [footnote Jason Goroncy review]. And if you add the black preachers Martin Luther King and Gardner Taylor, (and, if you want a Pentecostal, TD Jakes), that just about completes the list of English-speaking/writing ‘greats’ in the 20th and early 21st centuries, in my view.  (Oh, and don’t forget William Barclay, who in his commentaries and one-page reviews in the Expository Times provided more preachable material than anyone else in the 20th century.) [3]

So how would you select the best Christian sermons ever written? A book was published a decade ago in the U.K. titled Best Sermons Ever collected by – wait for it! – the assistant editor of the British newspaper Daily Telegraph, Christopher Howse [1]. Here’s Howse’s list: Peter the Apostle, John Chrysostom, St. Augustine, Aelfric, St. Bernard, The Homilies, Lancelot Andrewes, John Donne, Jeremy Taylor, John Bunyan, Jonathan Swift, Jonathan Edwards, John Wesley, Lawrence Sterne, Sydney Smith, John Henry Newman, Charles Spurgeon, Martin Luther King, H.A. Williams, and Pope John Paul II.

Now, class, what does that list suggest to you? We’ll come back to that. In addition Howse offers excerpts from other sermons and prayers from people ranging from St. Francis of Assisi, George Herbert, John Keble… to moderns like Mother Teresa and Billy Graham.

First, a little introduction to the ‘practical theology’ of preaching. What is preaching supposed to ‘do’, if I can put the question into a utilitarian frame of reference? I’d suggest the best preaching is didactic, prophetic, and dramatic. [2]

Christopher Howse would, I think, prefer three other adjectives – erudite, scholarly, and/or ‘literary’. In other words, he comes to this exercise as a literateur, rather than as a homiletician. Notice the absence of modern American mainline preachers in his list? Yes, perhaps Jonathan Edwards, ML King and Billy Graham deserve a place, but what of the others most theologically-sophisticated Americans are reading, like those mentioned above? (The answer, from my experience of 8 – 10 trips to the U.K. for pastors’ conferences: on that side of the Atlantic many have never heard of them). And I’m surprised W E Sangster and James Stewart are missing.

So, frankly, most of these sermons are of classical – rather than devotional – interest only. Some of them are heavily impregnated with Latin phrases and other obscurantisms. And some fit into the category of ‘Why use 10 words when 100 will suffice?’

One of the best is a homiletical essay – Jonathan Swift’s ‘Upon Sleeping in Church’ . The text, of course, is about Eutychus falling out of the window, Acts 20:9: ‘The accident which happened to this young man hath not been sufficient to discourage his successors’. But frankly, I’d go to sleep in some of these sermons – especially Laurence Sterne’s on ‘Evil Speaking’.

And some are both brilliant and scary. How about this, from Jonathan Edwards’ 15-page sermon (without a title – but from one version of his famous ‘Sinners In the Hands of an Angry God’:

‘If you cry to God to pity you, he will be so far from pitying you in your doleful case, or showing you the least regard or favour, that instead of that, he will only tread you under foot.  And though he will know that you cannot bear the weight of omnipotence treading upon you, yet he will not regard that, but he will crush you under his feet without mercy; he will crush out your blood, and make it fly, and it shall be sprinkled on his garments, so as to stain all his raiment. He will not only hate you, but he will have you, in the utmost contempt: no place shall be thought fit for you, but under his feet to be trodden down as the mire of the streets.’ [4]

No wonder ‘revival’ broke out when people heard this sort of diatribe!

Some excerpts and notes (many of these are in the category ‘they don’t produce them like this anymore!’) :

* Wesley traveled on foot or horseback 225,000 miles and preached 40,000 sermons!

* Lancelot Andrewes mastered fifteen languages!

* ‘In Lapland witches sell winds’ (John Donne)

* ‘Celibate, like the fly in the heart of an apple, dwells in a perpetual sweetness, but sits alone, and is confined and dies in singularity; but marriage, like the useful bee, builds a house and gathers sweetness from every flower… and feeds the world with delicacies’ (Jeremy Taylor)

* ‘It is my duty – it is my wish – it is the subject of this day to point out those evils of the Catholic religion from which we have escaped’ (from Sydney Smith’s ‘The Rules of Christian Charity’ !). Another profundity from that sermon: ‘The evil of difference of opinion must exist – it admits of no cure’.

* ‘When people say that I acted charitably towards so and so, what they generally mean is that in fact that I hate his guts but managed to behave as though I didn’t’ (H. A. Williams)

An inspirational note from Martin Luther King: ‘Let us not despair. Let us not lose faith in man and certainly not in God. We must believe that a prejudiced mind can be changed, and that man, by the grace of God, can be lifted from the valley of hate to the high mountain of love… Let us have love, compassion and understanding goodwill for those against whom we struggle, helping them to realize that… we are not seeking to defeat them but to help them, as well as ourselves.’

This book reminds me of the 9 November 1895 Punch cartoon, which showed a timid curate having breakfast in his bishop’s home. The bishop is saying “I’m afraid you’ve got a bad egg, Mr Jones”, to which the curate replies, in a desperate attempt not to give offence: “Oh, no, my Lord, I assure you that parts of it are excellent!”.

If you are a theological or literary sophisticate who reads sermons without wanting to be ‘spiritually challenged’ by them, this book is for you…

~~


[3] http://www.jmm.org.au/articles/8527.htm . This interesting list of the (twenty) ‘Greatest Preachers of the Twentieth Century’ is regularly at the top of the 20,000+ ‘most-accessed’ articles on our website – except in the week-and-a-half before Mothers’ Day (!). The Baylor University list of ‘12 Most Effective  Preachers’ actually listed a woman – Barbara Brown Taylor (http://www.baylor.edu/mediacommunications/news.php?action=story&story=1036 ). Google her sermon at Riverside Church in New York on the Good Samaritan for an excellent example of modern, lucid, challenging preaching: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wds3OxzHNAI  The best list of outstanding modern preachers is the one comprising speakers at Yale’s  Lyman Beecher Lecture series - http://www.library.yale.edu/div/beecher.html


~~

PTFORSYTH (Goroncy) - wordy, erudite,  knew it was acquiesce 'in'.

Goroncy: PTFORSYTH astonishingly circumloquacious, as familiar with then-modern 'critical scholarship' as with English poets. Sermons three times longer than they needed to be. Verbosity Petered out with Barth, Tillich, THIELICKE .






MARRIAGE (FIND THE ACRONYM!)



On the 15th April, 1995, the Rev. Jan Croucher (my wife) and I 'celebrated' the marriage of our daughter Amanda, to John Southwell. The beautiful service at the Heathmont Baptist Church in Melbourne, Victoria, began with Amanda's four cousins - sisters who are all brilliant musicians - playing Bach's Air on the G String. After the vows, a homily. Here's what I said:

~~~

It is a privilege and joy to summarize the 'wisdom of the ages' (and of 35* years of marriage) about 'how to be happy though married'. Last year I spent three months writing a book about marriage and family, and read all the 'experts'...

I've delivered many of these homilies before, but only once at the wedding of one of my children... John and Amanda, these thoughts are a gift to you as you set out on one of life's greatest (and riskiest) adventures.

Actually, they're thoughts put together by both of us, your parents, on a romantic outing to and from the opera Turandot last Wednesday evening...

Marriage, according to the experts, is about eight things:

1.  HAPPINESS.

However, if you marry to find happiness you're marrying for the wrong reason. Happiness is where you find it, not where you seek it.

Happiness is serendipitous - a by-product of doing other worthwhile things. As you set some big goals for your life together, you'll look back from time to time and say of this occasion or that, 'Wasn't it great?'

And by the way, your partner can't 'make you happy': that's a decision you make for yourself. Indeed no other person on earth can satisfy all your needs... Ultimately, as the Psalms and Proverbs reiterate everywhere, 'Happy are those who fear the Lord.'

2. ACCEPTANCE.

This is the basic idea in the Christian concept of 'grace'. I am loved by God before I change, before I 'deserve' to be loved. This love-before-worth is to characterize our relationships as well. Indeed, people grow and change more profoundly once they are accepted as they are.

So in marriage, don't impose a program of change on the other: accept him or her as they are, and they'll be more likely to change anyway. Every culture has a proverb which says something to the effect that 'the sun does not command the bud to become a flower, but simply provides a climate of warmth so that the flower can become the beautiful creature it was meant to be.'

The Bible text for us here is Romans 15:7: 'Accept one another for the glory of God, as Christ has accepted you.'

3.  ROMANCE.

In our culture we 'fall in love' then marry. Romance, says Scott Peck (The Road Less Traveled) is a genetic trick that nature plays on us to hook us into marriage. Romance is to marriage as the colour of a car is to the car: beautiful, but not necessarily functional to any significant degree. True 'love' is a matter of the will: I _choose_ to love my partner. Romance is emotional and sexual.

Now romance is important: every couple ought to do romantic things together. Last Wednesday night Jan and I walked and talked along the South Bank of the Yarra: it was a magical evening: the city lights and the moon reflected on the water; the temperature was mild; we weren't in a hurry to be anywhere else. Last week a woman said to me, 'He buys me flowers and chocolates. I like that. But I'd rather do interesting or romantic things with him...' The Song of Solomon is a celebration of romantic/sexual love...

4.  DEVOTION.

In the words of Genesis and Jesus, we leave father and mother and cling to our married partner. In the vows you composed you said you are dedicating your life to the well-being of your mate. Later, you will have some difficult priorities to sort out. Like, 'Who comes first - my partner or my children?' 

The classical Christian approach to this 'hierarchy of loving' is: God first, spouse second, children third, everything else (church, job, others) follows. However, in a well-integrated life, these loves do not compete: they enrich each other, and are inter-related.

5.  WISDOM.

In the New Testament James invites us to ask for wisdom, and God will give it to us. John, Amanda, you'll need lots of this substance to survive a marriage. Males and females are not the same. Their bodies, minds, emotions and logics are different! Gender-wise, and sexually, they are different. Generally (but not invariably) women tend to have a more finely-developed intuition; men tend to be linear-thinkers. Both are OK, and complement one another: one is good for reading feelings, the other for solving problems. Men need to work harder on figuring out the agendas-behind-words. And I would encourage women to work harder at setting goals...

6.  OPENNESS.

Should you 'tell everything' to your partner? My answer is 'Almost everything'. You may decide that something is hurtful and will not be received or understood: sometimes you will choose not to 'link your mouth with your mind': some things are best left unsaid.

7.  RECREATION.

You are allowed to enjoy your life: you will never come out of it alive! Plan a day off together each week (the coming of children will complicate those plans, however). Look forward to enjoyable and interesting pursuits you both enjoy. But don't live for 'pleasure'. 'Play' is for 're-creation' - to strengthen you to go back into life to work. But you do not live to work: you work to live. Many men, and some women, are bigamous -married  to their jobs as well as their partners. Then, in mid-life, they have a 'crisis' - moving from significance to security, whereas the other might be moving the other way. That's a time for seeking the help of a counsellor.

8.  KINDNESS.

The early Christian leader Paul had a brilliant insight into husband/wife relationships when he exhorted husbands to love their wives, and wives to respect their husbands. The worst fate for a woman is to be raped and killed: self-respecting women feel awful when treated as objects.

The worst fate for a man is to be shamed before significant others: men sometimes commit suicide if their shame is too great. John and Amanda, if you give gifts of love and respect to each other, you're in for a special marriage.

Two final words: the opera Turandot is about love and death (the words in Italian are similar). All true loving is a kind of dying: 'dying to self' as the Scripture puts it, so that one can please the other.

And a thought from Richard Rohr, whose tapes you'll be hearing on your honeymoon. (He's probably the best popularizer of classical Christian spirituality in the English-speaking world: you'll enjoy him). He quotes Meister Eckhart to the effect that all true spirituality is about subtraction  whereas our culture says your significance is measured by all the stuff - money, material objects, degrees, status, power etc. - you add to your life. Don't buy into this heresy.

Marriage is all about being two good forgivers. And that's hard work. Notice the acronym we made from the initial letters of these key words?

The Lord bless you each-and-both, and keep you in his eternal love. Amen.

Rowland Croucher

DISCUSS.

1. What is happiness? Why is it serendipitous?

2. Why is 'acceptance-before-worth' so difficult? Someone prayed 'Lord, thank you that you love us before we change, as we change, after we change, and whether we change or not' - and it was an 'aha' experience for many at the Prayer Service. Why would that be?

3. Do you agree with Scott Peck's somewhat dismissive idea about romance? What are the relative advantages of the Western approach - falling in love then marrying - versus the traditional way: marrying the person arranged by parents and tribe, then 'falling in love'? What are the real differences between romantic love and realistic love? Share some ideas about romantic things married couples can enjoy...

4. Talk about 'leaving and cleaving'. How can young marrieds be better prepared for the exclusive, life-long commitment which a good marriage requires? How can we learn to 'leave' the habits and bad modelling about a marriage relationship many of us received during our childhood? (For example: he comes from a family where mother rules, father is weak. He therefore has serious trouble relating to the assertiveness of his wife, and her expectations of him as a 'leader' in the marriage).

5. Are males and females different - in the way they think, solve problems etc.? As the title of a book by Allan and Barbara Peace puts it: Why won't men listen and why can't women read maps?

6. About half the Christian writers of books-about-marriage say there should be no secrets at all between married partners. The other half believe that occasionally something might more appropriately be kept from the other for various reasons...  What do you think?

7. Try this generalization: 'Males often seek significance through their work, as they try to out-perform their peers. Women mostly seek security rather than significance - and primarily through relationships, and mothering. Then the mid-life crisis, when the situation is often reversed. He comes to the point of asking "Is that all there is?" and wants a relationship with his mate. But she has now made a life of her own and seeks significance in other contexts.'

8. Why do men need the gift of respect so badly? And why are women so fearful of being 'used'? How can 'the dance of marriage' resolve these needs?

P.S. Did you find the acronym?

* Now (2014) 54 years of very happy marriage!

Rowland Croucher, 

Revised June 2014.


Saturday, August 9, 2014

ABC'S CONTENTS



(This is one option for chapter-headings. Another is the earlier CONTENTS list - see earlier post on this Blog).

(What's missing? Any suggestions for 'K'?)

CONTENTS


FOREWORD


INTRODUCTION


1. AUTHORITY & CERTAINTY: WHO SAYS?


2. BIBLE


3. CHRISTIANITY AND ITS RETAIL OUTLETS (CHURCHES)


4. DEATH & DYING


5. ECOLOGY, ENVIRONMENT, EARTH


6. FAMILY: CHOOSING YOUR PARENTS WELL


7. GOD IS LOVE, GOOD & EVIL


8. HAPPINESS VS. JOY


9. ISLAM , INDIGENOUS/ABORIGINAL PEOPLES


10. JESUS


11. K????


12. LEADERSHIP & EMPOWERMENT; LGBTI QUESTIONS & RESPONSES


13. MARRIAGE & ROMANCE; MASTURBATION


14. 'NOW' HAS GREAT POWER


15. OTHERS: ‘WINNING FRIENDS AND INFLUENCING PEOPLE’


16. POVERTY & JUSTICE; POLITICS & POWER; PARADIGM SHIFTS


17. QUADRILATERAL (WESLEYAN)


18. RELIGIONS


19. SPIRITUALITY; SINS & MISDEMEANOURS


20. TRUST / FAITH; TIME


21. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: EMOTIONAL WELL-BEING MEANS DEALING WITH YOUR PAIN


22. VOCATION: ON THE PLANET FOR A PURPOSE


23. WOMEN & MEN; WAR & PEACE; WHAT WOULD JESUS DO?  


24. X MARKS THE SPOT: THE CROSS OF CHRIST AS THE CENTRE OF HISTORY


25. YOU: YES YOU, ARE AN UNREPEATABLE MIRACLE OF GOD’S CREATION


26. ZERO-HOUR: ETERNITY, HEAVEN & HELL


CHECK-LISTS


APPENDIX


ENDNOTES


INDEX


DISCUSSION QUESTIONS


FURTHER READING